Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Migrated scheduler file cache.go to structured logging #105969

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 9, 2021

Conversation

shiva1333
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Ref #105841

Special notes for your reviewer:

Added missing migration points, fixed previously migrated logs

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Migrated scheduler file `cache.go` to structured logging

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 28, 2021
@shiva1333
Copy link
Contributor Author

/sig instrumentation
/wg structured-logging
/area logging
/priority important-soon
/kind cleanup
/cc @kubernetes/wg-structured-logging-reviews

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/instrumentation Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Instrumentation. wg/structured-logging Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG Structured Logging. area/logging priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Oct 28, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. label Oct 28, 2021
@shiva1333 shiva1333 added this to Waiting on Reviewer in WG Structured Logging - 1.23 Migration Oct 28, 2021
@shiva1333 shiva1333 force-pushed the feature4/master/105841 branch 2 times, most recently from a82852b to 7e17184 Compare October 28, 2021 11:59
@shiva1333
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@serathius
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@dashpole
Copy link
Contributor

dashpole commented Nov 4, 2021

/triage accepted

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Nov 4, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 6, 2021
@shiva1333
Copy link
Contributor Author

shiva1333 commented Nov 6, 2021

ping @Huang-Wei for approval :)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. do-not-merge/contains-merge-commits Indicates a PR which contains merge commits. and removed needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Nov 6, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. and removed do-not-merge/contains-merge-commits Indicates a PR which contains merge commits. labels Nov 7, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 7, 2021
@shiva1333
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

Copy link
Contributor

@pohly pohly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@pohly
Copy link
Contributor

pohly commented Nov 8, 2021

/assign @damemi

For approval.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Nov 8, 2021
@serathius
Copy link
Contributor

This PR is needed to finish scheduler structured logging migration planned for 1.23
/milestone v1.23

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.23 milestone Nov 8, 2021
@shiva1333
Copy link
Contributor Author

ping @damemi for approval

@Huang-Wei
Copy link
Member

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Huang-Wei, pohly, shivanshu1333

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Nov 9, 2021
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project has merge-blocking tests that are currently too flaky to consistently pass.

This bot retests PRs for certain kubernetes repos according to the following rules:

  • The PR does have any do-not-merge/* labels
  • The PR does not have the needs-ok-to-test label
  • The PR is mergeable (does not have a needs-rebase label)
  • The PR is approved (has cncf-cla: yes, lgtm, approved labels)
  • The PR is failing tests required for merge

You can:

/retest

@pohly
Copy link
Contributor

pohly commented Nov 9, 2021

/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 927914d into kubernetes:master Nov 9, 2021
WG Structured Logging - 1.23 Migration automation moved this from Needs Approval to Done Nov 9, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/logging cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/instrumentation Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Instrumentation. sig/scheduling Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Scheduling. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. wg/structured-logging Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG Structured Logging.
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

8 participants