Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: skip instance not found when decoupling vmss from lb #105666

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 19, 2021

Conversation

nilo19
Copy link
Member

@nilo19 nilo19 commented Oct 14, 2021

What type of PR is this?

/kind bug

What this PR does / why we need it:

Ref: kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure#842
fix: skip instance not found when decoupling vmss from lb

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure#787

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

fix: skip instance not found when decoupling vmss from lb

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


/area provider/azure
/sig cloud-provider
/triage accepted
/priority critical-urgent
cc @feiskyer

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. area/provider/azure Issues or PRs related to azure provider size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. labels Oct 14, 2021
Copy link
Member

@feiskyer feiskyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 14, 2021
@feiskyer
Copy link
Member

/assign @cheftako @andrewsykim

@cheftako @andrewsykim could you help to approve this fix?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 14, 2021
@nilo19
Copy link
Member Author

nilo19 commented Oct 14, 2021

/hold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 14, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 14, 2021
@nilo19
Copy link
Member Author

nilo19 commented Oct 14, 2021

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Oct 14, 2021
Copy link
Member

@feiskyer feiskyer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/retest

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 14, 2021
@feiskyer
Copy link
Member

ping @cheftako @andrewsykim could you help to approve this fix?

@cheftako
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cheftako, nilo19

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 19, 2021
@bridgetkromhout
Copy link
Member

/retest

@bridgetkromhout
Copy link
Member

/test pull-kubernetes-node-e2e-containerd

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 421cdec into kubernetes:master Oct 19, 2021
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.23 milestone Oct 19, 2021
@nilo19 nilo19 deleted the fix/cherry-pick-842 branch October 22, 2021 02:17
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 9, 2021
…66-upstream-release-1.20

Automated cherry pick of #105666: fix: skip instance not found when decoupling vmss from lb
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2021
…66-upstream-release-1.22

Automated cherry pick of #105666: fix: skip instance not found when decoupling vmss from lb
k8s-ci-robot added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2021
…66-upstream-release-1.21

Automated cherry pick of #105666: fix: skip instance not found when decoupling vmss from lb
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/cloudprovider area/provider/azure Issues or PRs related to azure provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. priority/critical-urgent Highest priority. Must be actively worked on as someone's top priority right now. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. sig/cloud-provider Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Cloud Provider. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

More detailed error log about "instance not found"
6 participants