New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: consolidate logs for instance not found error #105188
Conversation
665368b
to
1e21fe6
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
/retest
Need approval from cloud provider |
/retest |
/retest |
/retest |
@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ func TestGetVirtualMachineWithRetry(t *testing.T) { | |||
}, | |||
{ | |||
vmClientErr: &retry.Error{HTTPStatusCode: http.StatusInternalServerError}, | |||
expectedErr: fmt.Errorf("Retriable: false, RetryAfter: 0s, HTTPStatusCode: 500, RawError: <nil>"), | |||
expectedErr: fmt.Errorf("Retriable: false, RetryAfter: 0s, HTTPStatusCode: 500, RawError: %w", error(nil)), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not sure you want %w on something which I don't believe can be a wrapped error. Maybe just %v?
/lgtm |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cheftako, feiskyer, nilo19 The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
…88-upstream-release-1.20 Automated cherry pick of #105188: fix: consolidate logs for instance not found error
…88-upstream-release-1.22 Automated cherry pick of #105188: fix: consolidate logs for instance not found error
What type of PR is this?
/kind bug
What this PR does / why we need it:
fix: consolidate logs for instance not found error
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes kubernetes-sigs/cloud-provider-azure#789
Special notes for your reviewer:
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:
/sig cloud-provider
/area provider/azure
/priority critical-urgent
/triage accepted
cc @feiskyer